ND, United States
North Dakota does not have any state legislation around cord blood education, but their Dept. of Health has officially adopted the educational materials from Parent's Guide to Cord Blood Foundation.
- What fraction of cord blood donations get accepted?
Between a half and three quarters of donations are discarded. The primary reason is that the collection volume is too small. Public banks will only save a collection that is big enough to transplant a large child or small adult.
- What questions should parents ask a Family Bank about Company Stability?
- Is the family cord blood bank a publicly-held or privately-held company?
- Is the company affiliated with a hospital or research institution?
- Is the company involved in bio-technology research and development?
- What other medical services does the company perform?
- How long has the company been banking cord blood?
- Who directs the day-to-day business of the company? Many cord blood banks have famous doctors on their Board of Directors; but they are not involved with the day-to-day operations.
- What is the lab inventory of cord blood collections, both public and private? This speaks to their staff's experience with storing cord blood.
- How many cord blood collections has the bank released from their own lab for therapy? This speaks to their staff's experience with releasing cord blood.
- How much blood and stem cells does a typical umbilical cord hold?
The median size of cord blood collections in family banks is 60mL or 2 ounces. That small volume of liquid corresponds to 470 million Total Nucleated Cells (TNC) or 1.8 million cells that test positive for the stem cell marker CD34. Thus, most healthy full-term babies have over a million blood-forming stem cells in their umbilical cord blood. By comparison, most public cord blood banks will only keep collections that are much bigger than average, and throw out the donations that are below a threshold of a billion TNC, corresponding to a blood volume of about 90-100 mL or 3 ounces.
Sun, JJ et al., Transfusion Sept. 2010; 50(9):1980-1987