Newsletter - May 2015
Umbilical Cord Blood Serum Eye Drops
Yvonne Holt, MD, Medical Director at Netcells Biosciences, South Africa
The ocular (eye) surface includes two major territories: the cornea and the conjunctiva, bordered by the upper and lower eyelids. It is imperative that this ocular surface remains healthy to ensure clear vision, maintain comfort and guard against infections.
Role of tears in healthy eyes
The ability to form tears plays an essential role in the maintenance of a healthy cornea and conjunctiva. The tear film over the eye's surface consists of mucus, aqueous, and lipid layers and contains many growth factors and vitamin A, which are essential for regulating the proliferation, differentiation, and maturation of the ocular surface epithelium.
Ocular surface disorders, including dry eye disease, are characterized by a decrease in quality and quantity of the tear film and changes in cell characteristics of the conjunctival epithelium. These disorders can severely affect eyesight and quality of life. Patients with ocular surface diseases suffer from loss of vision, discomfort and pain, infection, erosion, ulceration, and destruction with scarring of the eye surface.
Conventional treatments for ocular surface disorders include the application of artificial tears, topical anti-inflammatory agents, therapeutic contact lenses, and surgery to block the lacrimal puncta so that tears do not drain away.
Similarity between blood and tears
It is known that human blood serum contains many growth factors and other components that are similar to tears. Patients suffering from ocular surface diseases have often relied on serum made from their own blood to treat dry eye symptoms and to help heal erosions of the eye surface.
Here is a list of components in blood that resemble tears: (1) growth factors such as: epidermal growth factor (EGF), acidic and basic fibroblast growth factors, platelet-derived growth factor, hepatocyte growth factors, and transforming growth factors (TGF-α). Also fibronectin, serum antiprotease (α2-macroglobulin), vitamin A, neurotropic factors [substance P, insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1, and nerve growth factor (NGF)], (2) prealbumin, (3) oil and (4) antioxidants.
Subsequently, it was discovered that umbilical cord blood serum contained similar growth factors and Vitamin A. Cord blood has 2-3 times higher concentrations of these factors than adult blood serum and tears themselves.
Umbilical cord blood serum is effective in stimulating and regulating the proliferation, differentiation, and maturation of the ocular surface epithelium. In addition cord blood serum has been shown to have anti-inflammatory effects. Finally, cord blood serum has bacteriostatic effects due to antibacterial agents such as IgG, lysozymes and complement.The efficacy of Umbilical Cord Blood Serum has been demonstrated in the following conditions:
- Severe Dry eye with or without primary Sjögren's syndrome
- Ocular Graft-Versus-Host-Disease (GVHD)
- Persistent Epithelial Defects
- Corneal and conjunctival ulcers from any cause
- Recurrent corneal erosions
- Chemical burns
- Neurotrophic keratitis
- Refractory surgery
- Post Corneal Transplant
Therefore, it is recommended that umbilical cord blood serum drops can be used in any condition that may cause delayed epithelial healing of the eye or dysfunctional tear film. The drops have been successfully used in both adults and children.
Source of cord blood serum
Umbilical Cord Blood Serum eye drops are prepared from the umbilical cord blood donated by consenting mothers during the birthing process. All donors sign an informed consent and are screened for the following transmissible diseases: HIV, Hepatitis B & C, HTLV, Syphilis and CMV. The serum is discarded if any of these are positive.
The umbilical cord blood is collected from the umbilical vein of the placenta after delivery of the baby. The blood is left to clot at room temperature and centrifuged to separate the serum fraction from the cellular fraction. All samples are tested for bacterial and fungal contamination to ensure sterility of the product. The serum fraction is diluted to a 20% dilution and decanted into 5 ml eye dropper bottles using aseptic techniques in a clean room environment. The bottled serum is then frozen at -80°C for long term storage.
A cord blood collection volume can range from 60ml-120ml. The serum fraction is usually about 40% of the volume. After testing and 20% dilution, about 20-40 bottles of serum can be produced from a single cord blood collection.
As there are no preservatives in the eye drops, they must be stored frozen. The eye drops can be stored at a temperature less than -25°C for up to 2 years and at -18°C for 1 year. On prescription by a doctor, the eye drops are dispensed to a patient frozen, shipped from the laboratory on dry ice. At home, the patient must store the drops in their home freezer. To use the drops, the bottle of frozen drops must be thawed at room temperature and thereafter stored in the refrigerator at 2-8°C for a maximum of 7-10 days.
Regimen of patient therapy
Ophthalmologists suggest that patients use the cord blood serum eye drops in the affected eye or eyes in doses of 1-2 drops, up to 4-5 times per day, for up to 4-6 weeks. The drops can be used daily on a long term basis in patients who consistently have severe dry eyes. Treatment can be alternated between artificial tears and cord blood serum as the doctor sees fit.
Topical administration of umbilical cord blood serum does not cause adverse effects on the eye, because the serum has reduced immunogenicity. The titres of IgM and IgG antibodies are low and anti-A and anti-B antibodies are absent or only weakly detectable in the serum. The eye is also an immune privileged site with low immunogenicity on the surface. Umbilical cord blood serum does not contain any preservatives and does not cause any toxic or allergic reactions in the eye.
Umbilical cord blood serum has been shown to have great healing properties in ocular surface disorders. It is easy to collect and is immediately available to the patient in convenient bottles. It is also very useful in patients who have poor general health and who are unable to give blood to obtain their own serum.References
- Yoon, K.C; Use of Umbilical cord serum in ophthalmology; Chonnam Med J. 2014; 50:82-85
- Vajpayee, R.B. et al., Evaluation of umbilical cord serum therapy for persistent corneal epithelial defects. British journal of ophthalmology, 2003; 87(11):1312-1316.
Dr. Yvonne Holt is the Medical Director at Netcells Biosciences, a South African private stem cell and human tissue bank. Dr. Holt graduated from Wits University as a medical doctor and has a diploma in Paediatrics and Transfusion Medicine. Netcells specialises in the long term storage of baby stem cells (umbilical cord blood and tissue stem cells), adult stem cells (peripheral blood and adipose tissue stem cells), semen, human heart valves, amniotic tissue membrane used in ophthalmic surgery, and the production of umbilical cord blood serum eye drops. Dr. Holt is available to answer questions at Yvonne.Holt@netcells.co.za
Present Cord Blood Testing Fails to Determine if the Stem Cells Used for Transplantation are of High Quality and Potency
Ivan N. Rich, PhD, Founder & CEO HemoGenix
There is an aura that surrounds stem cells and their use. These rare cells are lifesaving, and are often the last resort, when transplanted into patients with blood malignancies. Umbilical cord blood (UCB) is a source of blood stem cells and their use to treat patients has been embraced worldwide since the first UCB stem cell transplant in 1988 .
Yet, despite this success, most people would be surprised to learn that when a UCB stem cell transplant is performed, neither the quality (the ability of the cells to proliferate) nor potency (a quantitative measure of biological function) of the stem cells are determined before they are given to the patient - in fact, the stem cell content is not measured at all .
How public cord blood banks decide to store UCB
When parents donate UCB to a public cord blood bank (CBB), the decision of whether or not to store the UCB unit is based primarily on the number of cells collected before and after processing. The processing usually removes most of the red blood cells and plasma. However, the final UCB unit still contains red blood cells, granulocytes, platelets, lymphocytes and other cells, in addition to stem cells. Together, these cell types all contribute to the so-called Total Nucleated Cell (TNC) fraction.
Public CBB only save UCB donations that have a high TNC count. The first reason they do this is because the UCB unit must be big enough to transplant an adult. The second reason is economics: public CBB must sell units for transplants in order to reimburse their operating expenses, and doctors are most likely to request the biggest units for their patients .
The FDA sets the minimum size threshold for UCB storage in a public CBB at 0.5 billion TNC per unit . But today, most public CBB that participate in the Be The Match network will only store UCB that have a TNC over 1.2 billion . Once stored, information about UCB in the Be The Match network is entered into a searchable database called EmTrax®.
This reliance on TNC will be important later, because the miscellaneous cells that contribute to the TNC act to dilute and mask the rare stem cells responsible for engraftment. Hence TNC counts can be a misleading way to characterize high quality UCB units.
Besides the TNC count, additional tests that are routinely used to characterize a UCB unit are: the CD34 assay, which is a test for a cell surface protein which is only present on a small proportion of stem cells ; a dye assay which determines whether the cells are alive or dead (ie: viability); and the Colony-Forming Unit (CFU) assay which tests the in vitro growth of progenitor cells [6,7].
How to know if stored UCB are High Quality
There are two major flawed assumptions associated with the "minimum guidelines" currently in use at public CBB . First, stem cells are assumed to be present, but that is never proved. To date over 730,000 UCB units have been collected by public CBBs and more than 35,000 transplants performed from these units worldwide . None of those units were characterized to ensure that the stem cells were of high-quality, let alone high potency.
The second flawed assumption is that the stem cells in the UCB unit will exhibit the same quality and potency when they are thawed and prepared for a patient, as they did when the unit was collected and tested prior to cryopreservation.
At HemoGenix, we have developed tests that measure the ability of cells to produce chemical energy in the form of adenosine triphosphate (ATP). All viable cells produce a certain amount of ATP. However, the amount of ATP produced can increase several fold when cells grow and proliferate. This fundamental relationship between ATP and proliferation allows both the quality and potency of stem cells to be quantified in a standardized and validated manner as recommended by FDA guidelines.
HemoGenix assays can measure stem cell quality before cryopreservation (STEMpredict) and potency after thawing (HALO-96 PQR) . HemoGenix is the only company that has developed a post-thaw stem cell potency assay that has the capability of predicting stem cell engraftment with over 90% accuracy .
Our current quality tests have multiple flaws
Unfortunately, the problems with our conventional cord blood transplant practices are even worse than described so far: not only are we not using the best tests available to measure UCB stem cells released for transplant, we also are not running those tests on the best samples to represent the UCB unit.
The current standard operating procedure is for CBB to perform quality assays on the small testing segments, each about 0.1mL in volume, that are sealed in strips of tubing attached to the main storage bag. It has been assumed that these test segments are both similar to each other and representative of the whole unit.
We conducted a study that compared post-thaw test results obtained with the HemoGenix HALO-96 SPC-QC versus conventional assays, for 63 testing segments and 10 whole UCB units that were sourced from two different CBB. The peer-reviewed publication of our study results found :
(1) Previous studies that demonstrated the correlation between traditional CFU colony counts and our ATP proliferation assay were confirmed.
(2) Paired UCB testing segments produced highly variable results, and the UCB testing segment did not produce similar results to the whole unit. This calls into question our reliance on testing segments when deciding whether a unit is of adequate size and quality for a patient.
(3) The TNC fraction produces variable results and TNC underestimates the stem cell quality and potency of both the testing segments and the whole UCB unit.
(4) Given that the TNC fraction is unreliable and tends to underestimate stem cells, our reliance on TNC count as a threshold for keeping or discarding CBU is misplaced. We may be discarding too many CBU from minority donors that have rare HLA types that are desperately needed for patients. In addition, a CBU with low TNC counts will not be used, even though the stem cells might be of higher quality and potency than a CBU with high TNC counts.
(5) Dye exclusion assays have been used to provide a rapid and reliable measure of live/dead cells (viability), but we did not find them to correlate with stem cell metabolic viability (e.g. ATP assay).
(6) The possibility that accepted viability measurements may produce false positive results is of particular concern, because this could lead to graft failure if a patient is transplanted with a UCB unit that is not in fact viable.
(7) All of the above points raise serious concerns about the accuracy of previous studies that compared the efficacy of cord blood transplants to other therapeutic modalities (such as haploidentical bone marrow transplants, etc.).
Call to Action
According to Be The Match, about 206,000 UCB units have been collected in the U.S. and some 5,000 of them have been transplanted. Of these, about 1,200 patients or about 24% have succumbed to graft failure [10,11]. Yet we are still using UCB testing practices that are inadequate to measure the quality and potency of the UCB stem cells that are given to patients.
In 2005, the Stem Cell Therapeutic and Research Act of 2005  required UCB stem cells to be of "high-quality" when stored. It also provided funding to establish HRSA's Advisory Council on Blood Stem Cell Transplantation. One of its charges is to identify the parameters that define a high quality CBU. To date, the meetings of this committee have not led to any official conclusions.
In 2009, the United States FDA designated transplants of unrelated UCB as a "drug" . Consequently, the public CBB that produce UCB are subjected to rigorous BLA licensure, yet the UCB units themselves are still governed by the FDA's old "minimum guidelines" that are "nonbinding recommendations" [4,13]. Not surprisingly, voluntary accrediting agencies have been reluctant to apply higher standards than these nonbinding FDA guidelines.
Recently, in 2014 a new industry trade association has formed called the Cord Blood Association . One of its stated priorities is the "rapid adoption of novel technology and therapies". The Association has to prove itself, since no new technology has been adopted in more than 25 years.
How can the FDA, standards organizations, and the cord blood community legitimize their present UCB testing practices, when they never measure the quality and potency of the stem cells they are purporting to give patients? At present 1 in 4 patients undergoing a cord blood transplant experiences graft failure. It is in everyone's best interest to ensure that patients receive the highest quality and most potent stem cell product available. Failure to do so is a betrayal of the patient's and the public's trust.
The average cost of a single cord blood unit is now estimated to be about $50,000 . For that price, the patient and his/her healthcare provider are entitled to accept only those UCB units that have been scientifically demonstrated to be of high quality and potency. Public CBB that do not accurately certify the quality and potency of their UCB drug product should not receive government subsidies or health insurance reimbursements.
Ivan N. Rich, PhD, is Founder and CEO of HemoGenix, a life sciences company located in Colorado Springs, USA. He has over 40 years experience in the fields of stem cell biology, hematology, in vitro toxicology and entrepreneurship. His company, HemoGenix, is the world leader for in vitro hemotoxicity testing and a pioneering company for developing stem cell quality control and potency assays for cell therapy and regenerative medicine products. Prior to starting HemoGenix in 2000, Dr. Rich was Director of Basic Research in the Division of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Professor at the University of South Carolina. Dr. Rich has written over 100 peer-reviewed research and review articles and has edited three books, the last being Stem Cell Protocols, published by Springer.Literature Cited:
- Gluckman E, Broxmeyer HA, Auerbach AD, et al. Hematopoietic reconstitution in a patient with Fanconi's anemia by means of umbilical-cord blood from an HLA-identical sibling. N Engl J Med. (1989) 26 321;1174-1178 DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198910263211707
- Paterson J, Moore CH, Palser E, Hearn JC, Dumitru D, Harper HA, Rich IN. Detecting primitive hematopoietic stem cells in total nucleated and mononuclear cell fractions from umbilical cord blood segments and units. J Translational Medicine (2015) 13:94 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-015-0434-z
- Bart T., Boo M, Balabanova S et al. Selection and sustainability: impact on selection of the cord blood units from the United States and Swiss registries on the cost of banking operations. Transfus Med Hemother 2013,40:14-20 doi: 10.1159/000345690
- United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Guidance for Industry. Biologics license applications for minimally manipulated, unrelated allogeneic placental/umbilical cord blood intended for hematopoietic and immunologic reconstitution in patients with disorders affecting the hematopoietic system (2014).
- Broxmeyer H. Predicting the quality of transplatable cord blood collections through prefreeze and postthaw Apgar scoring. Transfusion 2012; 52219-221 doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03501.x
- Szilvassy S. Measuring stem cells in cord blood: The value of the CFU assay. Parent's Guide to Cord Blood Foundation newsletter January, 2013
- Rich IN. The difference between stem cell viability and potency: A short guide for parents and patients. Parent's Guide to Cord Blood Foundation newsletter October 2013
- Ballen, KK, Verter, F, Kurtzberg, J: Bone Marrow Transplantation, Manuscript No. BMT-2015-293, in press
- Rich IN. Potency, proliferation and engraftment potential of stem cell therapeutics: The relationship between potency and clinical outcome for hematopoietic stem cell products. J Cell Sci Ther 2013 doi:10.4172/2157-7-13.S13-001
- Spellman S, Hurley CK, Brady C, Phillips-Johnson L, Chow R, Laughlin M, McMannis J, Reems JA, Regan D, Rubinstein P, Kurtzberg J; National Marrow Donor Program Cord Blood Advisory Group. Guidelines for the development and validation of new potency assays for the evaluation of umbilical cord blood. Cytotherapy. (2011). 13;848-55 doi:10.3109/14653249.2011.571249
- Ruggeri A, Labopin M, Sormani MP, Sanz G, Sanz J, Volt F, et al. Engraftment kinetics and graft failure after single umbilical cord blood transplantation using myeloablative conditioning regimen. Haematologica (2014) 99(9):1509-1515 doi: 10.3324/haematol.2014
- Stem Cell Therapeutic and Research Act of 2005
- United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Guidance for Industry. Minimally manipulated, unrelated allogeneic placental/umbilical cord blood intended for hematopoietic reconstitution for specified indications (2009)
- A Plan for a Cord Blood Association. Published for Public Comment by the Cord Blood Association Advisory Committee (2014)
- Cord Blood Association Advisory Committee Responses to Public Comments (2014)
- Goodman A. The ASCO Post. Umbilical cord blood transplant: Two units are no better than one in children with hematologic malignancies. January 15, 2013. Vol.4, Issue 1.