To support the work of the Parent's Guide to Cord Blood Foundation, click this button to make a tax deductible donation by credit card.
Legal Issues in UCB Banking
This summary is based on the article Annas, G.J. (5/13/1999) NEJM, vol.340 no.19 , "Waste and Longing - The Legal Status of Placental-Blood Banking" by a member of the Health Law Dept at the Boston University School of Public Health.
Annas further states, "Permitting the storage company to sell the placental blood to others for therapeutic use, on the other hand, would create conflicts between the storage facility and both the donor (who benefits, if at all, only if the blood is retained in storage) and the recipient (who would want records kept of the donor even though the donors would not)."
- The legal treatment of bone marrow transplants has been based on the model of organ donation. Even though bone marrow is a renewable resource, its collection is invasive and poses risk to the donor. Although the privacy of donor and recipient are protected from each other, careful records are kept of the screening and testing process.
- By contrast, the legal treatment of cord blood has been based on the model of blood donation. The collection of cord blood poses no risk to the mother or newborn, and was previously considered medical "waste". Consequently, public registries feel justified in banking cord blood anonymously, stripped of all source identity. There are fewer records about the source of a public cord blood unit than there would be about the source of an ordinary blood transfusion.
Annas further states, "Permitting the storage company to sell the placental blood to others for therapeutic use, on the other hand, would create conflicts between the storage facility and both the donor (who benefits, if at all, only if the blood is retained in storage) and the recipient (who would want records kept of the donor even though the donors would not)."
Last modified: 21.January 2010
Copyright 2000 - 2010 Frances Verter
Copyright 2000 - 2010 Frances Verter